You are currently viewing “How ICE Agents are Selected and Who are They?” By Kathy Moore.
The number of ICE agents has risen by 120% in the first year of Donald Trump's second termImage: John Locher/AP Photo/picture alliance

“How ICE Agents are Selected and Who are They?” By Kathy Moore.

We take a closer look at the rapid expansion of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents under former President Donald Trump’s administration — who these agents are, how they are recruited, and what it means for immigration enforcement in the United States.

Since Trump’s second term began, the number of ICE agents has more than doubled, soaring from 10,000 to 22,000 officers. This dramatic increase is largely fueled by an aggressive recruitment campaign launched by the Department of Homeland Security, which seeks to enlist “qualified patriotic Americans” nationwide. The expansion supports the Trump administration’s intensified deportation efforts, which reportedly removed over 600,000 individuals between January and December 2025, alongside nearly 2 million immigrants who chose to self-deport.

ICE, established in 2002 as a relatively low-profile law enforcement agency, now finds itself at the center of a highly politicized immigration crackdown. Such unprecedented growth has raised concerns about recruitment standards and training quality. Notably, ICE has halved its training period from 16 weeks to just 8 weeks, and removed the previously required Spanish language instruction, a key skill given the population it polices.

This rush to bolster ranks has alarmed many. The recent tragic death of Renee Nicole Good has sparked nationwide protests and led to the resignation of several federal prosecutors in Minnesota. Critics worry about the suitability of recruits and whether the accelerated training can prepare agents for the complex realities of immigration enforcement.

Legal expert Melissa Hamilton, a former police officer and now law professor, explains that ICE’s recruitment still demands citizenship, fitness, background checks, and sometimes prior law enforcement experience. However, she notes the current campaign emphasizes quantity alongside quality, with substantial funding to quickly fill tens of thousands of vacancies.

The recruitment drive is notable for its scale and messaging. High-budget advertising campaigns heavily leverage patriotic imagery, including Uncle Sam and historically charged artwork like the painting “American Progress,” which has drawn criticism for its portrayal of Native Americans. The Department of Homeland Security describes this as a “wartime recruitment” effort, with a $100 million advertising budget planned for 2026.

Beyond traditional ads, ICE employs sophisticated data-driven strategies to target potential recruits aligned with the Trump administration’s “America First” message. Techniques like geo-fencing serve recruitment ads to people near military bases, gun shows, and other venues popular with conservative audiences. Social media influencers on platforms favored by right-leaning viewers also help amplify the message.

Incentives such as signing bonuses up to $50,000 and student loan forgiveness are offered to attract candidates, primarily appealing to under-employed blue-collar workers rather than those motivated by social justice causes. The agency has also eliminated previous age limits, widening the candidate pool.

While the Department of Homeland Security insists on maintaining rigorous standards, opinions on recruitment success vary. Hamilton observes that while the campaign effectively increases numbers, questions remain about the experience and preparedness of new agents for the complexities of immigration enforcement.

In closing, the DHS asserts that with this growing team of “new patriots,” it will achieve what many deemed impossible — fulfilling the promise to “make America safe again.”

Reporting by Kathy Moore.

Leave a Reply